Skip to main content

Teaching as an Embodied Practice


"Recognition is inextricably intertwined with selfhood and personal identity"

"the practical active knowledge that animates teaching is something that belongs phenomenologically more closely to the whole embodied being of the person as well as to the social and physical world in which this person lives"

"our actions are sedimented into habituations, routines, kinesthetic memories ... [and] are sensitive to the contigencies, novelties and expectancies of our world."

I'd like to unpack these quotations with reference to the Heideggerian term Befindlichkeit that Manen mentions and to the Greek term phronesis that he alludes to when talking about 'practical wisdom.'

Central to both of these concepts is the idea of situatedness/embodiment/being-in-the-world. For Manen, and for me, this idea of temporal, spatial and individual existence is the critical piece, oft underemphasized by students, of teaching education. It reminds me of the three-body problem in computational modeling. Given two bodies, we can enter all we know about them and a computer can easily output a model of how those two bodies will interact. Add a third body, however, and the computer can no longer handle the load of variability needed to accurately make a predictive model. This is a good analogy for the experience of teaching. No amount of knowledge in the world can prepare us for the reality of teaching in a classroom full of students, each with their own experiential pasts, bodies, and brains. Even if there were only one student for each teacher, there are simply too many variables to consider. This is why I love the way Manen emphasizes the in-between place where theoretical, intellectual knowledge meets the physical reality of existence. It's the bridge between higher-level problem solving and baser instinct; it's where the rational and the animal interact.

To my mind, there is no way to develop and strengthen these interactions other than to practice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Whole Student

What three areas am I initially interested in regarding my Inquiry 1 & 2 project? Consent Understanding and respecting consent is one of the fundamental necessities for human interaction. And yet, we have a societal tendency to undermine or ignore children's boundaries both inside and outside the classroom. Sometimes, when the child's safety is a concern, an adult must intervene. But how much do we ignore student consent in order to accomplish our goals? My interest in this area is finding out how these actions impact students' ability to learn. Moreover, how to we healthily and helpfully incorporate non-coercive practice into the classroom? Additions - How do we balance student comfort and the learning goals? Sex and Gender Education There is plenty of literature to support the positive impact of comprehensive, realistic sex education. My question is how sex education impacts students' learning in other areas. We know that by the time they've hit grade 7...

Controlled Confusion?

Controlled confusion . Is this an oxymoron? Educational neuroscience reminds us that excess stress - when all you see on the board is hieroglyphs or the white hot panic when Teacher asks you a question and you're not even sure it was in English - gets in the way of learning. And not just a little. Chronic experience of excess stress will actually re-wire the brain in such a way that it can no longer properly regulate emotion. Imagine trying to concentrate when your body is in a constant state of fight, flight or freeze . It's obvious, then, that confusion has no place in the classroom. But is it? One of the tensions expressed in educational neuroscience and effective learning is that there is an optimal level of stress. Too much gets in the way, but too little does also. Learning is hard, and in order to make the cognitive jump to higher understanding, we need a little oomph. Healthy stress is an incredibly useful motivator. In this way, Teacher must balance on one scale  a ...